Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Advisor, Help Me!
Working With Exploratory and At-Risk Students
  • Presentation to OHAAA
  • March, 2008
  • Molly A. Schaller, Ph.D.
2
Our Time Together
  • A.A. Models get us started
  • Let’s Clarify…who are our at-risk students?
  • Why focus on at-risk students?
  • Differing approaches for differing needs?
  • Exploratory students
    • Who are they?
    • What are their needs?
    • What can you do?
3
At Risk Students

  • Describe the “at-risk students” at your institution
4
Models for Academic Advising
  • Process Includes (O’Banion, 1994):
  • (1) exploration of life goals,
  • (2) exploration of vocational goals,
  • (3) program choice,
  • (4) course choice, and
  • (5) scheduling courses
5
Academic Advising as Learning
(Hemwall & Trachte, 2005)
  • What should students learn through advising?
  • How might the learning take place?



  • They argue for advising centered on institutional mission.
6
NACADA’s Concept of
Academic Advising
  • Curriculum
    • What advising deals with
      • At-Risk Students
      • Exploratory Students
  • Pedagogy
    • How advising does what it does?
      • e.g. early intervention programs
  • Student Learning Outcomes
    • Results of Academic Advising


  • http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Clearinghouse/AdvisingIssues/Concept-advising-introduction.htm
7
NACADA’s
  • Each institution must develop its own set of student learning outcomes and the methods to assess them. The following is a representative sample. Students will:


  • craft a coherent educational plan based on assessment of abilities, aspirations, interests, and values
  • use complex information from various sources to set goals, reach decisions, and achieve those goals
  • assume responsibility for meeting academic program requirements
  • articulate the meaning of higher education and the intent of the institution’s curriculum
  • cultivate the intellectual habits that lead to a lifetime of learning
  • behave as citizens who engage in the wider world around them


8
Traditional Definitions
of At Risk
  • Academically under-prepared
  • Students from lower SES backgrounds
    • Often means working, carrying family responsibilities, travel difficulties, etc.
  • Students who have learning disabilities
  • First-generation college students
  • Not having a regular high school diploma
  • Delaying enrollment
  • Part-time enrollment or students who are not continuously enrolled
  • Students who are in the “minority” – this may be about race, gender, age, commuter, etc.


9
Another Way of
Looking at Risk
  • Academic Integration
  • Social Integration
    • Tinto, 1987
10

Do we know if our students
are becoming integrated
into our institutions?
11
"Retention Rates are relatively flat..."
  • Retention Rates are relatively flat (Habley & Schuh, 2007)
    • Explanations?
      • Students are changing quickly
      • Our efforts are attempting to impact the masses
      • Technology has impacted students’ movement throughout higher education
    • Implications!
      • Innovation
      • Complex approaches
      • Build on what we know about student success
12
Engagement…
(Kuh, Kinzie, Schuh, Whitt, et al., 2005)
  • “Living” Mission and “Lived” Educational Philosophy
  • Unshakeable focus on student learning
  • Environments adapted for educational enrichment
  • Clear pathways to student success
  • Improvement-oriented ethos..
  • Shared responsibility for educational quality and student success
13
Institutions that
do this well have… (Kuh et al.)
  • Academic challenge
  • Active and collaborative learning
  • Student-Faculty interaction
  • Enriching educational experiences
  • Supportive campus environments
    • Transition programs
    • Advising networks
    • Peer support
    • Multiple safety nets
    • Special support programs
14
Major Concern Areas
  • Academic support must be in place
    • Pre-college academic markers and grades in the first term are strongest predictors to retention to sophomore year (Kahn &
      Nauta, 2001)
    • Academic self-efficacy, academic goals, academic-related skills are the strongest psychosocial and study skills factors are the strongest overall predictors of college retention (Robbins et al., 2004)
15
Academic related-skills
  • What are the best approaches that you have in increasing academic related-skills at your institution?
16
Academic Goals
  • Some background
    • Default motivation (Cote & Levine, 1997)
    • Developmentally undecided…these students will move toward a major decision as their understanding of self and college options grows increase in self-efficacy.
    • Chronically undecided…don’t seem to grow in their understanding. (Guay et al, 2006)
  • How do we help students develop academic goals on our campuses?
17
A few approaches
  • Goal setting is a part of enrolling in the institution (Valencia Community College example)
  • Peer mentoring can be key (Indiana Wesleyan example)
  • Early intervention
  • Access to alums and others who have been successful
  • Coaching as an intrusive approach
18
Academic Self-Efficacy
  • Self-evaluation of one’s ability and/or chances for success in academic environment. Robbins et al.
  • Not terribly accurate in first term, more accurate in later terms.
  • + self efficacy can moderate stress
    • Zajacova, Lynch & Espenshade, 2005
  • Some evidence it can be increased with study skills course Boysen & McGuire, 2005


19
Academic Self Efficacy
at Risk
  • After First Term when students begin to better understand challenges and abilities
  • After missing the mark in a key course
  • After being denied entry into a program


  • What do you know about your students’ academic self-efficacy?
20
Academically At-Risk
  • Students who enter at risk are sometimes easily identifiable (based on pre-college academic factors, testing, self-identification)
    • Developmental Coursework
    • Tutoring
    • Supplemental Instruction


  • Others?
    • Early Identification Programs
    • Do you know how your advisees are doing in the first term? Second term? Third term?
    • When does early identification happen?
21
Early Identification Programs
  • Attendance
  • Performance
  • Classroom Behaviors


  • Early Intervention Could Include
  • Intrusive/required advising
  • Follow-up emails/phone calls
22
Approaches
  • Pay attention to our skills
  • Must be able to move beyond scheduling
  • Follow-up
  • Assess what is working
  • Use your resources
  • What else?
23
Break!
24
How did you decide on your major?
25
How did you decide on your career?
26
In Exploration…
  • [The first year] “I think it’s more like, if you’re going to build a house, like you’re just getting everything together…so then your sophomore year, you build like a solid foundation, because you really make a lot of decisions your sophomore year of what the rest of your college is going to be like, and what the rest of your years are going to be like. So, the decisions you make now, like where you’re gonna live next year, are really gonna impact you. Like picking a major…I think you make really strong decisions that way.”   Dan, sophomore
27
When do students explore?
  • Developmental question…
    • First you have to get in, make sense of the place
    • You have to know what you can do
    • Driven students and those very well prepared may begin in exploration
    • Some are decided in one area of life but still exploring in others
    • Often, the second year is a time when many students are exploring
28
Stages of the
Sophomore Year Schaller (2005)
  • Stages have tone and content
  • Students may experience multiple stages at one time
  • Major content areas: Relationships, Self, Academics


  • Random Exploration: exuberance, lack reflection
  • Focused Exploration: frustration,
  • reflection begins
  • Tentative Choices: relief,
  • some lingering anxiety – action begins
  • Commitment: confidence
29
Challenges Facing Sophomores
  • We know little about sophomores.
    • First year students and the change from beginning to end of 1st year or change from 1st to senior year is research focus
  • Transition into college has been completed.
  • This transition is primarily external.
  • Bridges (1980) calls this first step of transition the “Ending Process.”
  • Services are frontloaded to assist in the transition in to college.
  • Sophomores begin to experience the “Neutral Zone.”


30
Neutral Zone (Bridges, 1980)
  • Period of great insight.
  • Second year students have gathered a good deal of new information about self, peers, the world.
  • Loevinger (1976) called this the “conscientious” stage as students come to be self-evaluative, self-critical, responsible.
31
The Second Year (Academic)
  • New pressures & demands - decisions
  • Introspective about their studies without the tools and knowledge to make the most of the course work
  • Less contact with faculty & student life members than the first-year


  • Margolis, 1976; Pattengale & Schreiner, 2000


32
Developmental Advising
  • Random Exploration
    • Assess first year experience
    • Attend to motivation issues or behavior problems
    • Encourage reflection
      • I’ve noticed that you tend to skip classes. Tell me how you decide when you will go to classes and when you will skip?
    • Primary goal is to get students into a reflective position.
33
Developmental Advising
  • Focused Exploration
    • Assist students in assessment of current position
    • Review past
    • Include knowledge of self
    • Involvement in
      • Leadership
      • Internships or work exposure (summer/on campus)
      • Study abroad (where applicable)
      • Community Service
34
Learning Environments
  • Reflection
    • Encourage summer reflection (summer readings, emails, preparation for upcoming year)
    • Academic advising the supports a reflective approach (Hiram College)
    • Examination of personal values and direction (Indiana Wesleyan – “Life Calling, Work and Leadership”)
    • Connection between self and society (Community Standards Approach)
    • Leadership development opportunities – (Emory – ExCel)


35
Learning Environments
  • Exploration that builds experience
    • Career exploration (exploratory studies programs – U of Cincinnati)
    • Study abroad preparation (U. Minnesota approach)
    • Internships/co-ops
    • Service Learning – (Colgate University – Civic Education)
    • Campus Opportunities – (U of Denver Sophomore Year Conference)

36
Developmental Advising
  • Determine components for future exploration:
    • Possible majors and careers
    • Expand or direct involvement in leadership, service, work
    • Opportunities to explore life purpose and/or spirituality, help in definition of “dynamic”
37
Exploratory Studies Model
  • Essentially a way to combine academic advising and career development /counseling – perhaps even Alumni Relations
  • See Penn State’s Web Site
  • Indiana University


38
"Take the guess work out..."
  • Take the guess work out of exploration
  • Normalize the experience (after all, as many as 60-75% of college students change their major – NACADA)
  • This is time intensive – so be prepared
  • Use technology where you can
  • Requires coaching or mentoring as much as advising…
39
"Decision making practice that teaches..."
  • Decision making practice that teaches students to rule out while also selecting approaches.
    • Curricular and academic advising approaches -
    • Validate students as knowers in organization advising/supervision
    • Planning for the future – (U of Central Florida “Sophomore Halftime Retreat”)
    • Identifying problems with current choices and making changes – (U of South Carolina TSI Interactive Planning)
    • Community standards model -

40
"Insight into community,"
  • Insight into community, societal or world needs
    • Institutional mission as a starting place
    • Focus on civic engagement - (Clarion University – Transitions program, co-curricular transcript)
    • Common Reading for Sophomores



41
"Access to mentors and real..."
  • Access to mentors and real world experiences directly or through stories
    • Alumni dinners/contacts – (Colgate SYE)
    • Shadowing – (Boston College)
    • Mentoring – (U of South Carolina – Student Success Initiative – RA meetings)

42
"Group work,"
  • Group work, ongoing exposure to new peer connections, responsibility to others
    • Sophomores as peer mentors, common reading mentors, other leadership experiences
    • The sophomore retreat approach – (Beloit, religious organizations)
    • Research opportunities – (Pitt!)

43
Student Success Principles
  • The first six weeks of college are key – structure ways to connect with students using intrusive advising, course assignments, prized offerings
  • Contact with faculty and staff that clearly care has tremendous impact
  • Interventions must be tailored to students’ needs
  • Learning communities benefit all students
  • Remember that both academic and social integration are key, advise for both to keep students!
  • Use technology – there are wonderful options!