|
1
|
- Presentation to OHAAA
- March, 2008
- Molly A. Schaller, Ph.D.
|
|
2
|
- A.A. Models get us started
- Let’s Clarify…who are our at-risk students?
- Why focus on at-risk students?
- Differing approaches for differing needs?
- Exploratory students
- Who are they?
- What are their needs?
- What can you do?
|
|
3
|
- Describe the “at-risk students” at your institution
|
|
4
|
- Process Includes (O’Banion, 1994):
- (1) exploration of life goals,
- (2) exploration of vocational goals,
- (3) program choice,
- (4) course choice, and
- (5) scheduling courses
|
|
5
|
- What should students learn through advising?
- How might the learning take place?
- They argue for advising centered on institutional mission.
|
|
6
|
- Curriculum
- What advising deals with
- At-Risk Students
- Exploratory Students
- Pedagogy
- How advising does what it does?
- e.g. early intervention programs
- Student Learning Outcomes
- Results of Academic Advising
- http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Clearinghouse/AdvisingIssues/Concept-advising-introduction.htm
|
|
7
|
- Each institution must develop its own set of student learning outcomes
and the methods to assess them. The following is a representative
sample. Students will:
- craft a coherent educational plan based on assessment of abilities,
aspirations, interests, and values
- use complex information from various sources to set goals, reach
decisions, and achieve those goals
- assume responsibility for meeting academic program requirements
- articulate the meaning of higher education and the intent of the
institution’s curriculum
- cultivate the intellectual habits that lead to a lifetime of learning
- behave as citizens who engage in the wider world around them
|
|
8
|
- Academically under-prepared
- Students from lower SES backgrounds
- Often means working, carrying family responsibilities, travel
difficulties, etc.
- Students who have learning disabilities
- First-generation college students
- Not having a regular high school diploma
- Delaying enrollment
- Part-time enrollment or students who are not continuously enrolled
- Students who are in the “minority” – this may be about race, gender,
age, commuter, etc.
|
|
9
|
- Academic Integration
- Social Integration
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Retention Rates are relatively flat (Habley & Schuh, 2007)
- Explanations?
- Students are changing quickly
- Our efforts are attempting to impact the masses
- Technology has impacted students’ movement throughout higher education
- Implications!
- Innovation
- Complex approaches
- Build on what we know about student success
|
|
12
|
- “Living” Mission and “Lived” Educational Philosophy
- Unshakeable focus on student learning
- Environments adapted for educational enrichment
- Clear pathways to student success
- Improvement-oriented ethos..
- Shared responsibility for educational quality and student success
|
|
13
|
- Academic challenge
- Active and collaborative learning
- Student-Faculty interaction
- Enriching educational experiences
- Supportive campus environments
- Transition programs
- Advising networks
- Peer support
- Multiple safety nets
- Special support programs
|
|
14
|
- Academic support must be in place
- Pre-college academic markers and grades in the first term are strongest
predictors to retention to sophomore year (Kahn &
Nauta, 2001)
- Academic self-efficacy, academic goals, academic-related skills are the
strongest psychosocial and study skills factors are the strongest
overall predictors of college retention (Robbins et al., 2004)
|
|
15
|
- What are the best approaches that you have in increasing academic
related-skills at your institution?
|
|
16
|
- Some background
- Default motivation (Cote & Levine, 1997)
- Developmentally undecided…these students will move toward a major
decision as their understanding of self and college options
grows increase in self-efficacy.
- Chronically undecided…don’t seem to grow in their understanding. (Guay
et al, 2006)
- How do we help students develop academic goals on our campuses?
|
|
17
|
- Goal setting is a part of enrolling in the institution (Valencia
Community College example)
- Peer mentoring can be key (Indiana Wesleyan example)
- Early intervention
- Access to alums and others who have been successful
- Coaching as an intrusive approach
|
|
18
|
- Self-evaluation of one’s ability and/or chances for success in academic
environment. Robbins et al.
- Not terribly accurate in first term, more accurate in later terms.
- + self efficacy can moderate stress
- Zajacova, Lynch & Espenshade, 2005
- Some evidence it can be increased with study skills course Boysen &
McGuire, 2005
|
|
19
|
- After First Term when students begin to better understand challenges and
abilities
- After missing the mark in a key course
- After being denied entry into a program
- What do you know about your students’ academic self-efficacy?
|
|
20
|
- Students who enter at risk are sometimes easily identifiable (based on
pre-college academic factors, testing, self-identification)
- Developmental Coursework
- Tutoring
- Supplemental Instruction
- Others?
- Early Identification Programs
- Do you know how your advisees are doing in the first term? Second term?
Third term?
- When does early identification happen?
|
|
21
|
- Attendance
- Performance
- Classroom Behaviors
- Early Intervention Could Include
- Intrusive/required advising
- Follow-up emails/phone calls
|
|
22
|
- Pay attention to our skills
- Must be able to move beyond scheduling
- Follow-up
- Assess what is working
- Use your resources
- What else?
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- [The first year] “I think it’s more like, if you’re going to build a
house, like you’re just getting everything together…so then your
sophomore year, you build like a solid foundation, because you really
make a lot of decisions your sophomore year of what the rest of your
college is going to be like, and what the rest of your years are going
to be like. So, the decisions you make now, like where you’re gonna live
next year, are really gonna impact you. Like picking a major…I think you
make really strong decisions that way.”
Dan, sophomore
|
|
27
|
- Developmental question…
- First you have to get in, make sense of the place
- You have to know what you can do
- Driven students and those very well prepared may begin in exploration
- Some are decided in one area of life but still exploring in others
- Often, the second year is a time when many students are exploring
|
|
28
|
- Stages have tone and content
- Students may experience multiple stages at one time
- Major content areas: Relationships, Self, Academics
- Random Exploration: exuberance, lack reflection
- Focused Exploration: frustration,
- reflection begins
- Tentative Choices: relief,
- some lingering anxiety – action begins
- Commitment: confidence
|
|
29
|
- We know little about sophomores.
- First year students and the change from beginning to end of 1st
year or change from 1st to senior year is research focus
- Transition into college has been completed.
- This transition is primarily external.
- Bridges (1980) calls this first step of transition the “Ending Process.”
- Services are frontloaded to assist in the transition in to college.
- Sophomores begin to experience the “Neutral Zone.”
|
|
30
|
- Period of great insight.
- Second year students have gathered a good deal of new information about
self, peers, the world.
- Loevinger (1976) called this the “conscientious” stage as students come
to be self-evaluative, self-critical, responsible.
|
|
31
|
- New pressures & demands - decisions
- Introspective about their studies without the tools and knowledge to
make the most of the course work
- Less contact with faculty & student life members than the first-year
- Margolis, 1976; Pattengale & Schreiner, 2000
|
|
32
|
- Random Exploration
- Assess first year experience
- Attend to motivation issues or behavior problems
- Encourage reflection
- I’ve noticed that you tend to skip classes. Tell me how you decide
when you will go to classes and when you will skip?
- Primary goal is to get students into a reflective position.
|
|
33
|
- Focused Exploration
- Assist students in assessment of current position
- Review past
- Include knowledge of self
- Involvement in
- Leadership
- Internships or work exposure (summer/on campus)
- Study abroad (where applicable)
- Community Service
|
|
34
|
- Reflection
- Encourage summer reflection (summer readings, emails, preparation for
upcoming year)
- Academic advising the supports a reflective approach (Hiram College)
- Examination of personal values and direction (Indiana Wesleyan – “Life
Calling, Work and Leadership”)
- Connection between self and society (Community Standards Approach)
- Leadership development opportunities – (Emory – ExCel)
|
|
35
|
- Exploration that builds experience
- Career exploration (exploratory studies programs – U of Cincinnati)
- Study abroad preparation (U. Minnesota approach)
- Internships/co-ops
- Service Learning – (Colgate University – Civic Education)
- Campus Opportunities – (U of Denver Sophomore Year Conference)
|
|
36
|
- Determine components for future exploration:
- Possible majors and careers
- Expand or direct involvement in leadership, service, work
- Opportunities to explore life purpose and/or spirituality, help in
definition of “dynamic”
|
|
37
|
- Essentially a way to combine academic advising and career development
/counseling – perhaps even Alumni Relations
- See Penn State’s Web Site
- Indiana University
|
|
38
|
- Take the guess work out of exploration
- Normalize the experience (after all, as many as 60-75% of college
students change their major – NACADA)
- This is time intensive – so be prepared
- Use technology where you can
- Requires coaching or mentoring as much as advising…
|
|
39
|
- Decision making practice that teaches students to rule out while also
selecting approaches.
- Curricular and academic advising approaches -
- Validate students as knowers in organization advising/supervision
- Planning for the future – (U of Central Florida “Sophomore Halftime
Retreat”)
- Identifying problems with current choices and making changes – (U of
South Carolina TSI Interactive Planning)
- Community standards model -
|
|
40
|
- Insight into community, societal or world needs
- Institutional mission as a starting place
- Focus on civic engagement - (Clarion University – Transitions program,
co-curricular transcript)
- Common Reading for Sophomores
|
|
41
|
- Access to mentors and real world experiences directly or through stories
- Alumni dinners/contacts – (Colgate SYE)
- Shadowing – (Boston College)
- Mentoring – (U of South Carolina – Student Success Initiative – RA
meetings)
|
|
42
|
- Group work, ongoing exposure to new peer connections, responsibility to
others
- Sophomores as peer mentors, common reading mentors, other leadership
experiences
- The sophomore retreat approach – (Beloit, religious organizations)
- Research opportunities – (Pitt!)
|
|
43
|
- The first six weeks of college are key – structure ways to connect with
students using intrusive advising, course assignments, prized offerings
- Contact with faculty and staff that clearly care has tremendous impact
- Interventions must be tailored to students’ needs
- Learning communities benefit all students
- Remember that both academic and social integration are key, advise for
both to keep students!
- Use technology – there are wonderful options!
|